Archives for the month of: October, 2006

We are suffering from the most well-funded thought-control experiment in history, more sophisticated and deadly by many orders of magnitude than anything contrived by Kim Jong Il … . It is our empathy that is under attack, because if it is aroused to a point where Iraqis or Afghans or even our own imperial soldiers become real people (and not a yellow-ribbon magnet), the jig is up. So here is a simple reminder. This war is wanton cruelty in our name; there is no rationalization that can mitigate or excuse it; “we” will not win it and somehow transmogrify a swine into a swan … and it is not over.

Stan Goff: Reflecting on Rumsfeld

Bill Maher offers President Bush the best possible advice:

It’s time to do what you’ve always done best: lose interest, and walk away.

Real Time, August 26, 2005

New rule: If churches don’t have to pay taxes, they also can’t call the fire department when they catch fire. Sorry reverend, that’s one of those services that goes along with paying in. I’ll use the fire department I pay for. You can pray for rain.

Real Time with Bill Maher, 17 February 2006

Steve Paulson: It seems to me this is actually one of the key questions in the whole religion and science debate. What do you do with consciousness? I mean, do you really think the mind is totally reducible to neural networks and the electro-chemical surges in the brain? Or might there be something else that goes beyond the physical mechanics of the brain?

Richard Dawkins: [...] Consciousness is the biggest puzzle facing biology, neurobiology, computational studies and evolutionary biology. It is a very, very big problem. I don’t know the answer. Nobody knows the answer. I think one day they probably will know the answer. But even if science doesn’t know the answer, I return to the question, what on earth makes you think that religion will? Just because science so far has failed to explain something, such as consciousness, to say it follows that the facile, pathetic explanations which religion has produced somehow by default must win the argument is really quite ridiculous.

From the Salon interview.

Everyone seems to be pondering the “problem” of how to withdraw from Iraq. Here’s how you do it: you give the order.

Cease fire immediately.

The people on the ground are military personnel. They don’t say, Gee, I’m not sure. They say, Yes, sir. The brass says Jump, and they say, How high? The brass should say:

Cease fire immediately.

Obviously there are criteria according to which this solution is less than optimal. But those considerations are secondary to fact that our armed forces are over there, right now, killing people. We sent them there to kill people. That was wrong. It was among the worst things this nation has ever done. And we know that now, but we’re still doing it. We must call our forces back, right now, before anyone else is killed. The longer we wait, the more people die. We must stop. Right. Now.

Getting the men out is not the problem. That they are there is the problem; getting them out is the solution. People are dying over there. We must stop killing. It’s that simple! Stop killing! — not according to some schedule, but now!

Everyone’s asking how should we handle or schedule or organize or justify the pullout. That is bullshit. The war is something we’re doing, and we have to stop doing it. There is no how! Just stop! We notice what we’re doing, and that it is terrible, and we stop. Give the order, not some day, not even today, but right now. Say something like this. Translate it into militarese if you want to, but do it now.

Do not kill one more person. Do not fire another fucking shot. Stop fighting, right now. Pack up your things, starting now.

Come home.

Commanders, I challenge you. How many troops can you reach today, before the sun goes down? Close this browser window and get started. Thank you.

From the New York Times:

BAGHDAD, Oct. 10 — A team of American and Iraqi public health researchers has estimated that 600,000 civilians have died in violence across Iraq since the 2003 American invasion, the highest estimate ever for the toll of the war here.

A New Estimate of Civilian Deaths The figure breaks down to about 15,000 violent deaths a month, a number that is quadruple the one for July given by Iraqi government hospitals and the morgue in Baghdad and published last month in a United Nations report in Iraq. That month was the highest for Iraqi civilian deaths since the American invasion.

But it is an estimate and not a precise count, and researchers acknowledged a margin of error that ranged from 426,369 to 793,663 deaths.

If we had 250 billion dollars to spend on regime change in Iraq, we could have given every single one of the 25 million residents of Iraq ten thousand dollars. I bet they wouldn’t “hate our freedoms” then!

From the New York Times: Evangelicals Fear the Loss of Their Teenagers, 6 Oct 2006

“I’m looking at the data,” said Ron Luce, who organized the meetings and founded Teen Mania, a 20-year-old youth ministry, “and we’ve become post-Christian America, like post-Christian Europe. We’ve been working as hard as we know how to work — everyone in youth ministry is working hard — but we’re losing.”

Yesssssss!

From Wikipedia:

Though the Act had formally given legislative powers to the government as a whole, these powers were for all intents and purposes exercised by Hitler himself; as Joseph Goebbels wrote shortly after the passage of the Enabling Act:

The authority of the Führer has now been wholly established. Votes are no longer taken. The Führer decides. All this is going much faster than we had dared to hope.

From Wikipedia:

On the evening of February 27, 1933 — six days before the parliamentary election — fire broke out in the Reichstag chambers. While the exact circumstances of the fire remain unclear to this day, what is clear is that Hitler and his supporters quickly capitalized on the fire as a means by which to speed their consolidation of power. Seizing on the burning of the Reichstag building as the opening salvo in a communist uprising, the Nazis were able to throw millions of Germans into a convulsion of fear at the threat of Communist terror. The official account stated:

The burning of the Reichstag was intended to be the signal for a bloody uprising and civil war. Large-scale pillaging in Berlin was planned…. It has been determined that … throughout Germany acts of terrorism were to begin against prominent individuals, against private property, against the lives and safety of the peaceful population, and general civil war was to be unleashed….

The decree was improvised on the day after the fire (February 28) after discussions in the Prussian Ministry of the Interior, which was led by Hermann Göring, and was then brought before the Reich cabinet. In the ensuing discussions, Hitler stated that the fire made it now a matter of “ruthless confrontation of the KPD” and shortly thereafter, President von Hindenburg, 84 years old and lapsing in and out of senility, signed the decree into law.

The decree, officially the Verordnung des Reichspräsidenten zum Schutz von Volk und Staat (Order of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State), invoked the authority of Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution which allowed the Reichspräsident to take any appropriate measure to remedy dangers to public safety.

The decree consisted of six articles. Article 1 suspended most of the civil liberties set forth in the Weimar Constitution — freedom of the person, freedom of expression, freedom of the press, the right of free association and public assembly, the secrecy of the post and telephone, not to mention the protection of property and the home. Articles 2 and 3 allowed the Reich government to assume powers normally reserved to the federal states (Länder). Articles 4 and 5 established draconian penalties for certain offenses, including the death penalty for arson to public buildings. Article 6 simply stated that the decree took effect on the day of its proclamation.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.