<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for YASHWATA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yashwata.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yashwata.info</link>
	<description>  &#160;yet another secular humanist with all the answers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:35:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can a church have beliefs? by Priy</title>
		<link>http://yashwata.info/2011/10/19/can-a-church-have-beliefs/#comment-10095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Priy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yashwata.info/?p=1016#comment-10095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that uritilatians want to look at all available information. So certainly a decision can be proven by time to have been utility-maximising. However, I think that inasmuch as it is a moral theory, meant to help us make the best decisions, it has to be committed to something like: you should do what is best given the information that is available to you at the time. You are deciding whether to shoot a man in Reno just to watch him die. Unbeknownst to you, he is a terrorist planning an attack on innocent civilians. I think it&#8217;s hard for a utilitarian to praise you, exactly, if you pull the trigger. However, if you have an honest, reasonable belief that a given course of action will maximise happiness in time, then I think you have every right to claim vindication if time proves you right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that uritilatians want to look at all available information. So certainly a decision can be proven by time to have been utility-maximising. However, I think that inasmuch as it is a moral theory, meant to help us make the best decisions, it has to be committed to something like: you should do what is best given the information that is available to you at the time. You are deciding whether to shoot a man in Reno just to watch him die. Unbeknownst to you, he is a terrorist planning an attack on innocent civilians. I think it&#8217;s hard for a utilitarian to praise you, exactly, if you pull the trigger. However, if you have an honest, reasonable belief that a given course of action will maximise happiness in time, then I think you have every right to claim vindication if time proves you right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The myth of Christian charity (part 1) by YASHWATA</title>
		<link>http://yashwata.info/2010/07/15/charity1/#comment-10093</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YASHWATA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yashwata.info/?p=837#comment-10093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Historically, religious people who wanted to help the poor (or whoever) started religious organisations dedicated to that purpose.

In a society dominated by religion, any organization has to be religiously affiliated to be successful. So, yes, there have been religious humanitarian organizations; they are humanitarian for humanitarian reasons, and religious for political reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historically, religious people who wanted to help the poor (or whoever) started religious organisations dedicated to that purpose.</p>
<p>In a society dominated by religion, any organization has to be religiously affiliated to be successful. So, yes, there have been religious humanitarian organizations; they are humanitarian for humanitarian reasons, and religious for political reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The myth of Christian charity (part 1) by yorksranter</title>
		<link>http://yashwata.info/2010/07/15/charity1/#comment-10092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yorksranter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yashwata.info/?p=837#comment-10092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In fact, historically, religious people who wanted to help the poor (or whoever) started religious organisations &lt;em&gt;dedicated to that purpose&lt;/em&gt;. Pilgrims are being attacked on the road to Jerusalem? You want the Knights Templar. The inhabitants of southern Lebanon have been bombed out of their houses again. You want the Islamic Relief Society.

Anyway, good post - it&#039;s worth knowing that the whole story about churchgoers being especially generous is an accounting artefact. 

Come to think of it, in some places a substantial chunk of worshippers&#039; contributions is used for political purposes, notably the US. Nobody thinks, however, that giving to, say, Occupy Wall Street is charity &lt;em&gt;even though a lot of it was spent on providing for the homeless&lt;/em&gt;. That&#039;s &lt;em&gt;politics&lt;/em&gt;. (And in fact I think most Occupiers would deny that they were a charity.) Giving to Pat Robertson&#039;s church, though, so that he can spend it on TV campaign ads and robocalls, well, that&#039;s officially equivalent to giving your money direct to starving children.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, historically, religious people who wanted to help the poor (or whoever) started religious organisations <em>dedicated to that purpose</em>. Pilgrims are being attacked on the road to Jerusalem? You want the Knights Templar. The inhabitants of southern Lebanon have been bombed out of their houses again. You want the Islamic Relief Society.</p>
<p>Anyway, good post &#8211; it&#8217;s worth knowing that the whole story about churchgoers being especially generous is an accounting artefact. </p>
<p>Come to think of it, in some places a substantial chunk of worshippers&#8217; contributions is used for political purposes, notably the US. Nobody thinks, however, that giving to, say, Occupy Wall Street is charity <em>even though a lot of it was spent on providing for the homeless</em>. That&#8217;s <em>politics</em>. (And in fact I think most Occupiers would deny that they were a charity.) Giving to Pat Robertson&#8217;s church, though, so that he can spend it on TV campaign ads and robocalls, well, that&#8217;s officially equivalent to giving your money direct to starving children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Religiosity and generosity: where does the question come from? by YASHWATA</title>
		<link>http://yashwata.info/2011/11/14/where/#comment-10090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YASHWATA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yashwata.info/?p=1031#comment-10090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To say that &quot;charity is a part of practicing religion&quot; begs the question. My research indicates that Christianity is a tradition of &lt;em&gt;talking about&lt;/em&gt; charity rather than actually performing it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To say that &#8220;charity is a part of practicing religion&#8221; begs the question. My research indicates that Christianity is a tradition of <em>talking about</em> charity rather than actually performing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Religiosity and generosity: where does the question come from? by rlwheele</title>
		<link>http://yashwata.info/2011/11/14/where/#comment-10089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rlwheele]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yashwata.info/?p=1031#comment-10089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously no one is asking whether playing blackjack makes you more generous. They may however be asking whether playing poker makes someone a better liar. Because lying / bluffing is an important part of the practice of playing poker. There is no grand conspiracy here. Of course people are interested in finding out if religion makes someone more generous because charity is a main tenant of most religions. Charity is a part of practicing religion. Logically then you would suspect that people who practice a particular religion might be more charitable than those that don&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously no one is asking whether playing blackjack makes you more generous. They may however be asking whether playing poker makes someone a better liar. Because lying / bluffing is an important part of the practice of playing poker. There is no grand conspiracy here. Of course people are interested in finding out if religion makes someone more generous because charity is a main tenant of most religions. Charity is a part of practicing religion. Logically then you would suspect that people who practice a particular religion might be more charitable than those that don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to safely refill your Braun Pulsonic cleaning cartridge (UPDATED) (UPDATE 2) by vee gee</title>
		<link>http://yashwata.info/2008/03/14/how-to-refill-braun-pulsonic-cleaning-cartridges/#comment-10085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vee gee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yashwata.info/?p=246#comment-10085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lot of idiots who know jack shit about chemistry spewing crap here.

Anyway, about 70-80% ethanol (rest is water), 1-3 mL glycerol, and a few drops of your favourite scent will work well.

Other notes:

Alcohols are polar. They dissolve well in other polar substances like water and glycerol (glycerin). They DO NOT dissolve well with non polar substances like oils. They dissolve a LITTLE BIT but not a great deal. Also, water can dissolve a limited amount of non-polar substances as well.

Methanol is poisonous if you metabolize it or absorb a great deal of it. I HIGHLY doubt that the amount that&#039;s on your razor is enough to do anything at all to you. It is poisonous if you drink it because it is metabolized in your body to formic acid. If you absorb too much of it by other means, it is a CNS depressant similar to ethanol (drinking alcohol).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lot of idiots who know jack shit about chemistry spewing crap here.</p>
<p>Anyway, about 70-80% ethanol (rest is water), 1-3 mL glycerol, and a few drops of your favourite scent will work well.</p>
<p>Other notes:</p>
<p>Alcohols are polar. They dissolve well in other polar substances like water and glycerol (glycerin). They DO NOT dissolve well with non polar substances like oils. They dissolve a LITTLE BIT but not a great deal. Also, water can dissolve a limited amount of non-polar substances as well.</p>
<p>Methanol is poisonous if you metabolize it or absorb a great deal of it. I HIGHLY doubt that the amount that&#8217;s on your razor is enough to do anything at all to you. It is poisonous if you drink it because it is metabolized in your body to formic acid. If you absorb too much of it by other means, it is a CNS depressant similar to ethanol (drinking alcohol).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to safely refill your Braun Pulsonic cleaning cartridge (UPDATED) (UPDATE 2) by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://yashwata.info/2008/03/14/how-to-refill-braun-pulsonic-cleaning-cartridges/#comment-10083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 04:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yashwata.info/?p=246#comment-10083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[has anyone tried to use the norelco hq200 solution instead?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has anyone tried to use the norelco hq200 solution instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to safely refill your Braun Pulsonic cleaning cartridge (UPDATED) (UPDATE 2) by dspatola</title>
		<link>http://yashwata.info/2008/03/14/how-to-refill-braun-pulsonic-cleaning-cartridges/#comment-10079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dspatola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yashwata.info/?p=246#comment-10079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have given your readers false potentially harmful information. Please read the following:

Do not use any denatured alcohol except SD-38 or SD-40. Most other denatured alcohols contain methanol which is toxic including the fumes. The SD alcohols contain denaturing agents that prevent consumption of the ethanol but are non-toxic. This is why they are used in mouthwashes and other products that contact our bodies. SD alcohols are difficult to obtain. SD-40 alcohol is known as &quot;perfumers alcohol&quot;. Use this Google search to find:

http://www.google.com/#pq=perfumers+alcoho&amp;hl=en&amp;cp=17&amp;gs_id=7&amp;xhr=t&amp;q=perfumers+alcohol&amp;pf=p&amp;sclient=psy-ab&amp;safe=off&amp;source=hp&amp;pbx=1&amp;oq=perfumers+alcohol&amp;aq=0&amp;aqi=g4&amp;aql=&amp;gs_sm=&amp;gs_upl=&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&amp;fp=55dcc7523cfd78c6&amp;biw=1272&amp;bih=776

 I use grain alcohol, 190 proof..

The &quot;perfume&quot; is lemon extract with oil of lemon not the fake stuff. Five drops will do.

The lubricant is a type of silicone which is soluble in alcohol (polar solvent). This is known as phenyl trimethicone. Also difficult to obtain. Shin Etsu of Akron, Ohio distributes it as &quot;KF-56&quot;. Good luck getting some. Twenty drops will do.


Don Spatola]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have given your readers false potentially harmful information. Please read the following:</p>
<p>Do not use any denatured alcohol except SD-38 or SD-40. Most other denatured alcohols contain methanol which is toxic including the fumes. The SD alcohols contain denaturing agents that prevent consumption of the ethanol but are non-toxic. This is why they are used in mouthwashes and other products that contact our bodies. SD alcohols are difficult to obtain. SD-40 alcohol is known as &#8220;perfumers alcohol&#8221;. Use this Google search to find:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/#pq=perfumers+alcoho&#038;hl=en&#038;cp=17&#038;gs_id=7&#038;xhr=t&#038;q=perfumers+alcohol&#038;pf=p&#038;sclient=psy-ab&#038;safe=off&#038;source=hp&#038;pbx=1&#038;oq=perfumers+alcohol&#038;aq=0&#038;aqi=g4&#038;aql=&#038;gs_sm=&#038;gs_upl=&#038;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&#038;fp=55dcc7523cfd78c6&#038;biw=1272&#038;bih=776" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/#pq=perfumers+alcoho&#038;hl=en&#038;cp=17&#038;gs_id=7&#038;xhr=t&#038;q=perfumers+alcohol&#038;pf=p&#038;sclient=psy-ab&#038;safe=off&#038;source=hp&#038;pbx=1&#038;oq=perfumers+alcohol&#038;aq=0&#038;aqi=g4&#038;aql=&#038;gs_sm=&#038;gs_upl=&#038;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&#038;fp=55dcc7523cfd78c6&#038;biw=1272&#038;bih=776</a></p>
<p> I use grain alcohol, 190 proof..</p>
<p>The &#8220;perfume&#8221; is lemon extract with oil of lemon not the fake stuff. Five drops will do.</p>
<p>The lubricant is a type of silicone which is soluble in alcohol (polar solvent). This is known as phenyl trimethicone. Also difficult to obtain. Shin Etsu of Akron, Ohio distributes it as &#8220;KF-56&#8243;. Good luck getting some. Twenty drops will do.</p>
<p>Don Spatola</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to safely refill your Braun Pulsonic cleaning cartridge (UPDATED) (UPDATE 2) by Dinko</title>
		<link>http://yashwata.info/2008/03/14/how-to-refill-braun-pulsonic-cleaning-cartridges/#comment-10078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yashwata.info/?p=246#comment-10078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this recently.

I bought Braun 790 year and half ago, used original cartrige for about half year then after I found out that in Croatia are almost $30 US or 23EUR I just cleaned it with water.

Last week head become to noisy and hurt while shaving so I guess blades are not sharp as they should be.

 Now crusing on eBay and saw these replacements and by asking google about this &quot;miracle water&quot; I found this.

So I am using this chance to ask you guys should I try to save this head with cleaning with rubbing alcohol or to buy new head and then apply your replce solution for Braun cartiges?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this recently.</p>
<p>I bought Braun 790 year and half ago, used original cartrige for about half year then after I found out that in Croatia are almost $30 US or 23EUR I just cleaned it with water.</p>
<p>Last week head become to noisy and hurt while shaving so I guess blades are not sharp as they should be.</p>
<p> Now crusing on eBay and saw these replacements and by asking google about this &#8220;miracle water&#8221; I found this.</p>
<p>So I am using this chance to ask you guys should I try to save this head with cleaning with rubbing alcohol or to buy new head and then apply your replce solution for Braun cartiges?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to safely refill your Braun Pulsonic cleaning cartridge (UPDATED) (UPDATE 2) by Tareq</title>
		<link>http://yashwata.info/2008/03/14/how-to-refill-braun-pulsonic-cleaning-cartridges/#comment-10077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tareq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 10:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yashwata.info/?p=246#comment-10077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[291 comments so far ,, that&#039;s a wealth of opinions!
I wanted to mention one point and inquire about another,

Well, alcohol dissolves oil, true, but that&#039;s a reversible reaction, like water and salt.. The trick is that the oil while dissolved in alcohol does not interfer much with the detregent properties alcohol, but once the last layer of alcohol dries off the surface of the metallic &amp;moving parts of the Pulsonic razor head, the traces of oil will not evaporate, and form a uniform thin layer of oil , hence, lubrication is achieved.

My question: have you noticed any tear and wear on your Braun pulsonic over repeated times of using this formula??
Thanks again, and I will be reviewing  and hopefully commenting more of your interesting articles ..
Merry xmas &amp; Happy new year]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>291 comments so far ,, that&#8217;s a wealth of opinions!<br />
I wanted to mention one point and inquire about another,</p>
<p>Well, alcohol dissolves oil, true, but that&#8217;s a reversible reaction, like water and salt.. The trick is that the oil while dissolved in alcohol does not interfer much with the detregent properties alcohol, but once the last layer of alcohol dries off the surface of the metallic &amp;moving parts of the Pulsonic razor head, the traces of oil will not evaporate, and form a uniform thin layer of oil , hence, lubrication is achieved.</p>
<p>My question: have you noticed any tear and wear on your Braun pulsonic over repeated times of using this formula??<br />
Thanks again, and I will be reviewing  and hopefully commenting more of your interesting articles ..<br />
Merry xmas &amp; Happy new year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

